Funding for Michigan’s public schools has fallen moresharply than any other state over the past quarter century, new research fromMichigan State University finds.
Educators have been forced to meet rising academic standards with inadequate finances, the study authors argue. However, their research shows Michigan could give schools the dollars they need if policymakers devoted the same share of its economy to supporting education as they did a decade ago.
Total revenue for Michigan schools has declined by 30percent since 2002 when adjusted for inflation, the study shows. MeanwhileMichigan ranks at the bottom for growth in math and reading proficiency.
“Michigan has tried to improve schools on the cheap, focusing on more accountability and school choice,” said David Arsen, MSU professor of education policy and lead author of the study. “To make those policies effective, they have to be matched with adequate funding. We have been kidding ourselves to think we can move forward while cutting funding for schools.
“We don’t have to wait any longer. We know that this isn’tworking.”
Arsen details a plan to transform K-12 funding in “Michigan School Finance at the Crossroads: A Quarter Century of State Control.” The report, co-authored by MSU doctoral students Tanner Delpier and Jesse Nagel, also provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of trends since the 1994 passage of the landmark Proposal A law, which largely shifted funding from local school districts to the state.
“Our goal is to provide information, from a long period of research and observation, that will guide a re-evaluation of the way we fund schools,” Arsen said. They found that, after adjusting for inflation, Michigan’s education funding in 2015 was only 82 percent of what it was in 1995—worse than any other state.
Today, Michigan covers less than one-third of costs for federally required special education, which means school districts devote, on average, $500 per student of general education dollars each year to pay for those services. In addition, students from low-income families now account for half of all students, but per-pupil state support for them has dropped even more sharply, by 60 percent.
A plan to change paths
The report evaluates the 2018 study by the Michigan School Finance Research Collaborative (MSFRC) and advances a comprehensive set of policy recommendations.
The authors endorse the MSFRC’s estimated base cost of$9,590 to educate a typical student to meet state performance standards andrecommend additional funding weights for students living in poverty, Englishlanguage learners and special education students. The authors also estimate theadditional revenue needed to implement these policies, including universalpreschool.
While they don’t prescribe specific sources, Arsen and his co-authors say lawmakers must find new revenue to increase state coffers for education. This can occur through changes in sales, property or income tax policy, stricter scrutiny of tax expenditures and by allowing local districts to levy voter-approved enhancement millages.
“Citizens will support providing additional funding to schools if they know how the money will be spent, and they believe the revenues have been raised fairly,” Arsen said. “Providing those resources to schools is well within reach of the state in our current economy. This is what’s necessary to establish the foundation for the important work of teaching and learning.”
Related links
Read the full report.
See the key findings of Michigan School Finance at the Crossroads in the form of infographics.
MSU researchers outline the growing body of research on the connection between funding and student learning in a new policy brief, “Does Money Matter in Education? Reconsidering an Old Question with Reference to Michigan.”